Judge stopped from hearing Mobilla's case

March 17, 2011 (Front page)

THE Supreme Court yesterday prohibited the trial judge in the case of the three soldiers who are alleged to have murdered Alhaji Issa Mobilla from further hearing the case.
The court, accordingly, quashed the decision of Mr Justice Senyo Dzamefe to continue sitting on the case after the foreman of the seven-member jury had been replaced due to ill-health.
In a unanimous decision, the court, presided over by Professor Dr Justice Date Bah, with Mrs Justice Sophia Adinyira, Mr Justice Annin Yeboah, Mr Justice B. T. Aryeetey and Mr Justice S. Gbadegbe as panel members, held that the trial judge lacked jurisdiction to hear afresh the suit against the accused persons after he was elevated to the Court of Appeal.
According to the court, the trial judge had the authority to hear only part-heard cases and for that reason his decision to continue hearing the case after the foreman of the jurors had been replaced as a result of ill-health was wrong in law.
It, accordingly, upheld a motion filed on behalf of the soldiers by their counsel, Mr Thaddeus Sory, who prayed the court to prohibit the trial judge because he had no mandate.
According to the applicants, the trial judge’s continuous hearing of the case would be unconstitutional.
The applicants further argued that the trial judge had also exhibited bias against them and for that reason they could not be guaranteed a fair trial.
Two of the soldiers, Corporal Yaw Appiah and Private Eric Modzaka, who were clad in white shirts were present in court.
The third accused person, Private Seth Goka, is currently on the run.
The three have been charged with two counts of conspiracy and murder. Appiah and Modzaka, who are currently in custody, have pleaded not guilty to the charges.
Before the ruling, the court enquired from a Chief State Attorney, Mr Rexford Wiredu, who stood in for the substantive prosecutor in the case, whether or not the Chief Justice had permitted the trial judge to hear the case afresh.
The following transpired between the panel members and Mr Wiredu.
Prof Dr Justice Date Bah: Any basis for him (trial judge) to continue hearing the case?
Mr Wiredu: Yes
Prof Dr Justice Date Bah: Where is the evidence? Refer it to us.
Mr Wiredu: It is in a letter.
Mrs Justice Adinyira: In all your statements of case, there was no reference to any letter from the Chief Justice authorising the trial judge to hear the case afresh. So where are you going to get the letter from?
Mr Wiredu: I concede that the trial judge had no authority from the Chief Justice to start the case afresh. (He stated that after he had groped through the filed documents and realised there was no letter from the Chief Justice authorising the trial judge to hear the case afresh after a new juror had been sworn in.)
Meanwhile, the substantive case at the Fast Track High Court has been adjourned to March 24, 2011.
The three soldiers were alleged to have murdered Alhaji Mobilla, who was the Northern Regional Chairman of the Convention People’s Party (CPP), on December 9, 2004.
The facts of the case are that Alhaji Mobilla was arrested by the police on December 9, 2004 for allegedly supplying the youth in Tamale with guns to foment trouble.
While he was in custody, the police claimed that they received information that his followers and sympathisers were mobilising to free him. The deceased was consequently transferred from police cells to the Kamina Military Barracks and handed over to the three accused persons.
According to the prosecution, Alhaji Mobilla died in military custody three hours after he had been handed over to the accused persons who were on duty that day.
The chief pathologist’s report revealed that the deceased was sent to the hospital dead and that he died from multiple wounds.