|  | 
| Tony Lithur | 
A legal practitioner, Mr Tony Lithur, has denied rumours he has been defending businessman Alfred Agbesi Woyome in court.
“This rumour, which has found its way onto radio stations and other 
media platforms including social media, is completely false. In any 
case, Woyome himself has stated publicly that I have a personal vendetta
 against him,” counsel noted.
According to Mr Lithur, his law firm which had the current 
Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Mrs Marietta Brew 
Appiah-Opong, as a partner, had on all occasions defended Woyome’s 
opponents.
Reacting to the said rumours in an interview with the Daily Graphic
 in Accra yesterday, Mr Lithur said “our firm has handled four cases 
against Woyome. Two have been settled and two are still pending in 
court”.
Woyome gains freedom
Woyome was on Thursday, March 12, 2015 acquitted and discharged on 
two counts of defrauding by false pretence and causing financial loss to
 the state.
The High Court, presided over by Mr Justice John Ajet-Nasam took on 
the Attorney-General’s Department for paying GH¢51.2 million to Woyome 
in 2010 only to turn around to prosecute him for fraud.
It said the prosecutors failed to prove the ingredients of fraud to warrant the court to convict Woyome.
The Attorney-General’s Department has expressed its disagreement with
 the judgement and has since indicated its intention to appeal.
Where from rumours
The court’s decision has sparked public outcry and in the midst of it
 Mr Lithur and Mrs Appiah-Opong have been aligned with Woyome.
“I do not know where this falsehood of us defending Woyome is coming 
from. It is amazing how people can sit and conjecture falsehood only in 
the name of what?” Mr Lithur queried and advised persons engaged in what
 he termed “vile propaganda” to stop.
Cases in question
“We have never represented Woyome in any matter. In all matters, we have been against him,” Mr Lithur said.
Enumerating the cases his firm had handled against Woyome, Mr Lithur 
said his firm was representing the Managing Editor of the Enquirer 
newspaper, Mr Raymond Archer, in the case in which Woyome sued Mr Archer
 over ownership of the paper.
“The second was a defamation suit Woyome filed against  the Enquirer 
but it was thrown out after we raised preliminary legal objections.
“Woyome has since re-filed the defamation suit but is yet to pursue it,” Mr Lithur explained.
Explaining further, counsel said his client, Mr Ray Smith, sued 
Woyome for a $1 million loan Woyome took from him to run his (Woyome’s) 
foundation.
According to counsel, Mr Smith resorted to the court when Woyome allegedly refused to pay back the said amount.
Mr Lithur continued, “There are correspondences between Woyome and us to prove we had acted against him.”
Citing another instance of disagreement between his client and 
Woyome, counsel said Mr Smith was indisposed and as a result of that he 
(Mr Smith) appointed Woyome as an alternate director in Mpowapak but 
“Woyome took more than GH¢200,000  from the company’s account resulting 
in my client pursuing him to pay back. He has since paid back all the 
money to my client”.
Austro-Invest
In the fourth case, Mr Lithur said Austro-Invest contacted him to 
make claims against Woyome after Austro-Invest had given Woyome the 
power of attorney to follow up on the GH¢51.2 million, which had been 
duly paid.
 Austro-Invest had worked with a team that negotiated for the 1.1 billion euro facility from Bank Austria.
“I filed the suit on behalf of Austro-Invest but I advised the 
company to withdraw the suit after hell broke loose on the said GH¢51.2 
million,” Mr Lithur added, and advised the public to make statements 
from informed positions. 
Mr Lithur did not indicate the action he would take if the “vile 
campaign” did not stop, but warned “this vile campaign to tag my firm 
and I as Woyome’s allies will not wash. It will be in the interest of 
those championing those lies to stop with immediate effect”. 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment