June 19 page 71
A witness in the legal fight over the
ownership of $391,250 has enumerated how she suffered humiliation for
two weeks at the hands of the Economic and Organised Crime Office
(EOCO).
The Managing Director of Auxesia
Energy Limited, Mrs Faith A. Odulu, said the company’s account was
frozen without any notification from the EOCO.
Aside from
that, she said EOCO failed to give her audience for two weeks, although
she was honouring an invitation to report at the EOCO.
Last
Tuesday, led by her lawyer, Mr Godfred Yeboah Dame, to justify why the
$391,250 which was withdrawn from her company’s account be returned, she
indicated how she had to use influential people to gain audience with
the EOCO.
According to the witness, the Deputy Director of EOCO
informed her and her Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Mr Bola J.
Olorunsaiye, that the company had committed serious crimes but never
specified the type of crime.
Background
Auxesia Energy
Limited, Soleushing Nigeria and Soleushing UK are laying claim to the
$391,250. Soleushing Nigeria is arguing that its vessel was used by
Auxesia Energy Limited’s client, Earth Petroleum to cart Low Pour Fuel
Oil (LPFO) from Nigeria to Ghana. Based on that, the company is
demanding that the money must be paid to it.
But Soleushing UK is
insisting the vessel does not belong to Soleushing Nigeria. It has even
gone ahead to accuse Soleushing Nigeria of stealing the vessel.
Auxesia
Energy Limited, on the other hand, is arguing that it did not transact
business with the two companies, and is, therefore, praying the court to
order the return of the money into its account.
Existence of EOCO
Mrs
Odulu told the court that she got to know the existence of the EOCO for
the first time in June 2013 when she went to withdraw money from the
company’s account at the UT Bank only to be told that the account had
been frozen by the EOCO.
As part of her company’s resolve to find
out why the account was frozen, Mrs Odulu said her company wrote to the
UT Bank and a company by name Lushann International Energy Limited to
arrange a meeting with EOCO to demand why the account was frozen.
Mrs Odulu said her company finally had audience with EOCO after several previous attempts had yielded no results.
At the said meeting, the witness said she was made to explain how Auxesia Energy Limited came across Earth Petroleum.
She
said she explained how her company and Earth Petroleum signed a Sale
and Purchase Agreement (SPA) with Earth Petroleum for the supply of
16,676 metric tonnes of LPFO.
In the said agreement, Chief
Christopher Isiboi, signed on behalf of Earth Petroleum, while the CEO
of Auxesia Energy Limited, Mr Bola J. Olorunsaiye, initialled on behalf
of Auxesia Energy Limited.
Soleushing not party to agreement
Asked
if Soleushing Nigeria and Soleushing UK were parties to the SPA, Mrs
Odulu answered in the negative and explained that Earth Petroleum was to
supply the LPFO, as well as pay for the charter of the vessel, which
was billed to discharge the LPFO at Saltpond.
“Funny events”
Describing
the events that occurred after the arrival of the LPFO as “funny,” Mrs
Odulu told the court that Earth Petroleum had challenges with the crew
members, who demanded payment before the discharge of the product.
She
said Chief Isiboi informed her that the crew members were agitating
that they had not been paid salaries for six months and, therefore,
pleaded with her company to make a financial commitment to meet the
demands of the crew members.
Following from that, Mrs Odulu said
she got in touch with UT Bank which agreed to allow her to issue a
$391,250 cheque in favour of Earth Petroleum. She further explained that
Auxesia Energy Limited had made previous payments to Earth Petroleum.
EOCO not party to suit
Earlier,
an investigator with the EOCO, Mr Patrick Kofi Awoonor, told the court
during cross examination that he was not aware that there was a suit
pending at the Commercial Court over the ownership of the vessel that
transported the LPFO.
Asked by Mr Dubik Yakubu Mahama, counsel for
Soleushing UK, if his outfit liaised with the Cape Coast Police to
investigate a report over the alleged stealing of the vessel by
Soleushing Nigeria, Mr Awoonor replied in the negative.
The
investigator said his outfit had not liaised with the Nigerian Maritime
Authority over the alleged misconduct of the vessel that carted the
LPFO.
Mr Awoonor said he did not investigate the origin of the vessel, although it was claimed to have come from Nigeria.
No comments:
Post a Comment